Quick Answer: Is There An Alternative To Wikipedia?

What can I use instead of Wikipedia?

But for those who prefer more reliable information, there are several Wikipedia alternatives online with various models that each offer different advantages.Encyclopedia Britannica Online.

Scholarpedia.

Citizendium.

MSN Encarta.

Infoplease.

Conservapedia.

What is the most reliable encyclopedia?More items…•.

Is Wikipedia struggling financially?

Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales said Thursday that the free online encyclopedia is in good financial shape, although increasing mobile phone use may cut into future donations. “We are doing very well financially,” Wales told AFP ahead of Vivatech, a Paris tech fair for start-up companies.

Why is Wikipedia a bad website?

Wikipedia is not a democracy, and its editors may face numerous restrictions on freedom of speech, including various types of sanctions. Certain images have also been blacklisted from Wikipedia, since they have been deemed potentially offensive.

Who is Wikipedia owned by?

Wikimedia FoundationWikipedia/OwnersWho owns Wikipedia? Who owns the Web site? Wikipedia’s tech framework is supported by a non-profit parent organization, the Wikimedia Foundation Inc, which also supports Wikipedia’s sister projects, including Wiktionary (a wiki dictionary), Wikibooks (textbooks), and others, and owns all of their domain names.

Why have I been blocked from editing Wikipedia?

The reason for your block may be found above. Problem with your editing or Wikipedia behavior (under any account or IP address) – your account or a connected IP has been used in a problematic way or there is a concern about your editing. … These can be blocked for any period of time to protect site security.

Why is Wikipedia not a reliable source?

Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. However, because Wikipedia is a volunteer-run project, it cannot monitor every contribution all the time. …

Is Britannica better than Wikipedia?

They found that in general, Wikipedia articles were more biased—with 73 percent of them containing code words, compared to just 34 percent in Britannica. In almost all cases, Wikipedia was more left-leaning than Britannica. … Other categories did not have enough data to significantly identify bias.

Why do teachers hate Wikipedia?

Originally Answered: What makes Wikipedia so detested by teachers? When Wikipedia first became mainstream it was deemed to be less than accurate. Teachers recommended that students not use it because it ran the risk of misinforming students; worse than uninformed students.

Is Wikipedia asking for donations 2020?

“We ask you, humbly: don’t scroll away,” the message, now pinned atop every Wiki page, reads. “We depend on donations from exceptional readers, but fewer than 2% give. … According to SimilarWeb, Wikipedia.org has 5.2 billion visits in July 2020 and was the eight most popular site in the world.

Is Wikipedia unbiased?

Wikipedia articles are longer, on average, than Britannica articles, and on a per word basis Wikipedia is actually slightly less biased. … And the authors found that “Wikipedia articles which have received more revisions tend to be more neutral.” The more the crowd works on an article, the less biased it is.

Does Wikipedia Make Money?

Given Wikipedia’s status as part of the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit, it makes money in a much different way than other major websites. Wikipedia is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, and is funded primarily by reader donations. … The average donation is just $15.

How much of Wikipedia is wrong?

“The study did reveal inaccuracies in eight of the nine entries and exposed major flaws in at least two of the nine Wikipedia articles. Overall, Wikipedia’s accuracy rate was 80 percent compared with 95-96 percent accuracy within the other sources.”

Is Wikipedia the best website?

Today, Wikipedia is the eighth-most-visited site in the world. … The English-language version recently surpassed 6 million articles and 3.5 billion words; edits materialize at a rate of 1.8 per second.

Who uses Wikipedia the most?

Additionally, Wikipedia is generally more popular among those with annual household incomes of at least $50,000, as well as with young adults: 62% of internet users under the age of 30 using the service, compared with only 33% of internet users age 65 and older.

Is Wikipedia going out of business?

But is the website on the brink of bankruptcy? The answer is no. Run by non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia’s balancesheet looks quite healthy. In fact, its donations have increased many folds in the last seventeen years.